|
|
|
|
Safest Hospital Articles:
Are Hospital Safe, (c) Jennifer Pirtle,
Women's
Health Magazine, September/October 2005
They're supposed to be the ultimate
places of healing, so why have our hospitals become so
dangerous? And, more important, how can you avoid the
problems?
Kathy McCabe, 31, had already seen two doctors about
the stabbing pain in her stomach. But when it worsened,
she headed to the ER near her home in Washington, D.C.
After lying on the hospital floor in anguish for more
than 2 hours, McCabe was given a CAT scan so doctors
could see 3-D images of her organs. The radiologist said
the CAT scan showed nothing unusual, so the ER staff
gave McCabe two things. A prescription: More
painkillers. And directions: Go home. The next day
McCabe visited three more doctors. One internist
referred her to a surgeon, who wanted her to undergo
exploratory surgery. The third doctor, an internist who
specialized in geriatric issues, questioned McCabe
thoroughly and then urged her to retrieve her CAT scan
from the hospital. He took one look at the film and told
McCabe that she had advanced diverticulitis, a serious
infection of her digestive tract. Worse, her bloodstream
was overwhelmed by the resulting bacteria.
"He couldn't believe how sick I was," McCabe says. "He
said my colon was in danger of bursting."
The doctor put McCabe on antibiotics for 2 months.
Although McCabe says she didn't suffer any lasting
health complications from the "nothing's un-usual"
diagnosis at the ER, the experience has shaken her
confidence in the healthcare system and made her
apprehensive of hospitals.
"I now know I can't take what a doctor says as 100
percent true," she says.
150,000
Shortage of Nurses Nationally
More than ever, medical mix-ups, errors, and
misjudgments have turned safe havens into potentially
dangerous ones. Just consider the stats:
As many as 98,000 people die each year in U.S. hospitals
from medical errors, according to the Institute of
Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences. That's
more than from car accidents, breast cancer, or AIDS.
Nearly 2 million people pick up infections in hospitals
each year — largely due to preventable errors — and
90,000 people die from them.
While it's tempting to blame a staff's ineptitude,
ignorance, or irreverence, experts say the problem is
simply 21st century health care. "It's safe to make the
assumption that every person who goes to work in a
hospital is there to help. Unfortunately they quite
often end up doing the opposite," says Thomas Sharon,
R.N., M.P.H., author of Protect Yourself in the
Hospital.
The rise of HMOs during the past 2 decades, coupled with
lower reimbursements by Medicare and Medicaid, has
created a financial climate that has led hospitals and
clinics to cut staff and attempt to do more with less.
The result: Poor communication among staff, a faulty
system of checks and balances, and overworked or
minimally trained workers. The hardest hit has been the
nursing profession. The United States has a shortage of
nearly 150,000 nurses (the shortage is attributed, in
part, to early retirements caused by the physical and
emotional demands of the job). That shortage is expected
to climb to more than 800,000 in 15 years, according to
a report from the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services.
"The general public doesn't know how much of an impact
the nurse has on the safety of their care," says Ronda
Hughes, Ph.D., senior health science administrator at
the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality in
Maryland. It's the nurse, for example, who administers
medication and ensures that unsterile devices or
products aren't used.
Simply, fewer nurses means more mistakes. In 2002 the
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare
Organizations examined more than 1,600 hospital reports
of patient deaths and injuries since 1996. It found that
low nursing staff levels were a contributing factor in
24 percent of the cases. And adding just one additional
patient over four already in a nurse's care has been
shown to raise a surgical patient's risk of death by 7
percent.
"Nurses are trying to meet the needs of the patients,
but they're stressed, angry, and frustrated because they
know there aren't enough of themselves on staff," Dr.
Hughes says. With the average age of nurses at 45 and
most nurses retiring in their late 50s, it's becoming
especially challenging to find enough new recruits. Why?
Nationally, there simply aren't enough good instructors
to train them. "Schools are looking for doctor-trained
faculty, but these people have to take huge salary cuts
to teach," says Dr. Hughes, who estimates that most
nursing institutions are missing an average of five
full-time instructors. "Most just aren't willing to do
that."
235,000
Number of Medication Errors Hospitals Make Every Year
Julie botteri, 34, of marathon, florida, was visiting a
nearby hospital 4 years ago for an inflamed cat bite on
her left hand. The attending physician looked at her
index finger — which had swelled to twice its normal
size — and immediately ordered an intravenous antibiotic
drip. Because a cat's needle-like fangs inject bacteria
deep into a wound, the resulting infection could enter
the bloodstream and make its way into tissues and
organs, causing life-threatening complications like
pneumonia, heart infection, or the loss of a limb. "He
warned that if the bite didn't improve quickly, he'd
need to slice open my finger to release some of the
infection," Botteri says.
Botteri estimates she received four or five bags of the
antibiotic solution before a nurse changed the IV. "For
the 30 minutes it took the new bag to drain, it felt
like ice-cold water was flowing down my arm and across
my chest," she says. "I pressed the nurse call button
several times, but no one came until the shift change.
The nurses seemed overworked and exhausted."
Although the cool sensation Botteri felt was likely
because one liquid was colder than another, the
temperature disparity was enough to make Botteri ask
questions. At Botteri's urging, the new nurse checked
her charts and discovered that her predecessor had
mistakenly given saline instead of the crucial
antibiotic. Botteri resumed antibiotics, the infection
cleared, and she returned home within 3 days.
The most common type of medical error now is a
medication mistake. In 2003, 570 hospitals and
health-care facilities reported more than 235,000
medication errors to the database of the U.S.
Pharmacopeia, a nonprofit watchdog group that works with
the FDA. There were 13 different kinds of slipups,
including vague or unreadable prescriptions, right
medications given to the wrong patient, and mix-ups of
similarly named medications, such as giving Zantac, an
acid-reflux drug, instead of Zyrtec, an allergy drug.
Much of the problem circles back to the shortage. A 2004
study from the University of Pennsylvania found that the
risk of making an error increased when hospital nurses
worked more than 12 hours per shift, worked overtime, or
worked more than 40 hours per week. (Several states are
now banning or limiting mandatory overtime.)
"In hospitals you have the best people who are sometimes
at their worst," says Sharon, who has more than 20 years
of experience in the health-care field. "You can't
expect 100 percent performance of them every time they
go to work."
40
Percentage of Doctors Who Don't Wash Hands Enough
Ann eide, 37, from columbus, Mississippi, had a small
biopsy on her leg to test for mitochondrial myopathy, a
rare offshoot of muscular dystrophy. The resulting
incision was just 1-inch long and sutured with seven
stitches, yet Eide says that when she returned home from
the hospital, the wound "looked really red and was
oozing pretty badly."
She immediately called the hospital and was told over
the telephone not to worry, that the redness was
"normal." The next day, same thing. With the infection
worsening, Eide became concerned and went to an ER at
another hospital.
"The doctor who looked at my leg was shocked," Eide
says. "He called the wound 'horrific' and asked who had
done this to me. He told me that if the stitches had
been left in my leg much longer, the infection could
have become very serious." Antibiotics cleared the
infection within 1 week, but the wound remained tender
for nearly 4 months. "To this day it still throbs from
time to time," Eide says.
Hospital-acquired infections account for $4.5 billion in
excess health-care costs annually, the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention says. Infections, which
can be caused by bacteria, fungi, viruses, or parasites,
might already be in your body, or they can come from the
environment, contaminated hospital equipment,
health-care workers, or other patients. The most common:
Urinary tract infections. While a healthy bladder is
sterile, the bacteria that march up the rubber or
plastic tube can cause infection if the insertion site
is not properly cared for. A study at the University of
Michigan's Department of Internal Medicine found that
more than 1-quarter of catheter patients develop urinary
tract infections within 2 days of having a catheter
inserted. (They're relatively minor and go away with
antibiotics, but they add an average of 1 extra hospital
day to a patient's visit.)
Pneumonia. It often arises when intensive-care
patients are put on ventilators to help them breathe
easier. Patients who have had tubes inserted are 20
times more likely to develop pneumonia than ones who
haven't, mainly because the ventilators make it easier
for bacteria or vomit to get into the lungs, according
to the Association for Professionals in Infection
Control and Epidemiology.
Surgical infections. "Surgery increases a patient's
risk of getting an infection in the hospital, as broken
skin gives bacteria a way to enter into normally sterile
parts of the body," says Lance R. Peterson, M.D.,
director of clinical microbiology and infectious disease
research at Evanston Northwestern Healthcare in
Illinois. So-called surgical site infections can
originate with contaminated equipment, with health-care
workers, or anything in between. The CDC estimates that
500,000 such infections occur annually in the United
States. A single infection resulting from cardiac
surgery can cost a hospital as much as $42,000 to treat.
Hypervigilant hygiene, including proper wound care, is
crucial in preventing and combating infection.
Staphylococcus aureus (also known simply as "staph") are
bacteria that can live harmlessly on many skin surfaces,
especially around the nose, mouth, and genitals. But
when the skin is punctured or broken, as during surgery
or when a catheter is inserted, the bacteria can enter
the wound and make a person extremely sick. (Of mounting
concern is a sometimes-fatal staph variant known as MRSA,
which can be resistant to antibiotics.)
The most effective way to protect patients against
bacterial infections is hand-washing. Scrubbing just 20
to 30 seconds with soap and water, or rubbing with an
alcohol-based gel, helps health-care workers beat most
bugs. Yet hand-washing compliance by doctors in
hospitals is around 60 percent, mainly because of busy
workloads and a heavy patient rotation, according to a
recent report in the Annals of Internal Medicine.
"Health-care workers know they need to be doing it," Dr.
Peterson says, "but they're not very good in practice."
Zero
Cases of Ventilator-Induced Pneumonia at One Hospital
Using a New Protocol
Today more states and agencies are trying to make
changes to improve safety. Illinois, Pennsylvania,
Missouri, and Florida have passed laws requiring the
publishing of hospital-acquired infection rates (15
others are considering legislation). And last year the
FDA called for the inclusion of bar codes (think
supermarket scanners) on prescription drugs and
over-the-counter drugs commonly used in hospitals. New
medications covered by the rule will have to include bar
codes within 60 days of the medication's approval by the
FDA; most previously approved medicines and all blood
and blood products will have to comply with the new
requirements by 2006. They're good changes in theory,
but many states have shot down laws that would require
hospitals to report infection data (many hospitals don't
want data made public because of the bad press), and the
FDA ruling doesn't require hospitals to install
bar-coding systems. Another government-led initiative to
create a national electronic health network to share
clinical information will take at least a decade to
create and implement.
"More often than not, the government will try to start
some positive motion but will get bogged down in the
details," says Jeffrey Goldstein, M.D., senior physician
consultant for HealthGrades, an independent healthcare
quality ratings company in Golden, Colorado. That's why
change will likely come from other places. Dr. Goldstein
points to the "100,000 Lives" program, which was
launched in December 2004 by the Institute for
Healthcare Improvement, a nonprofit organization in
Cambridge, Massachusetts, which aims to show that
100,000 deaths can be avoided through simple
interventions. One hospital that joined the campaign,
Newark Beth Israel Medical Center in New Jersey, reduced
cases of ventilator-induced pneumonia to zero just by
weaning patients from ventilators more quickly.
Many others — from individual hospitals to larger
grassroots groups — are making their own changes. For
example:
The Department of Veterans Affairs began using a
proprietary bar-code system in its 1,300 care facilities
more than 5 years ago. Under the system all units of
medication leave the pharmacy with a bar-coded label
that can be scanned to correspond with a bar code on the
patient's hospital wristband, providing a way to track
missed doses and pinpoint errors in dispensing. Now the
VA reports a significant reduction in problems caused by
medication mistakes.
This year Evanston Northwestern Healthcare began
using a presurgical nasal swab screen to identify staph
DNA in 2 hours, as opposed to 4 days with older
techniques. This has helped the company's hospitals cut
postsurgical staph infection rates among patients
fivefold.
The Leapfrog Group, a collection of more than 170
companies and organizations that buy health care for
more than 35 million employees nationwide, is rewarding
hospitals with perks like bonus payments and increased
reimbursement rates. For a hospital to benefit, it must
pass recommended quality and safety practices. These
"leaps" include the use of a computerized system to
order tests and medication, assurance that patients with
high-risk conditions are cared for using procedures
shown to improve outcomes, and an intensive care unit
supervised by specialists in critical care medicine.
In 2003 Leapfrog's first three quality and safety
practices were estimated to have the potential to save
over 65,000 lives, prevent as many as 907,000 medication
errors each year, and save $41.5 billion.
Ideally, hospitals, agencies, and the government will
look to provide optimal care and make patient safety a
priority, but these decisions may be tempered by
financial constraints, Dr. Goldstein says. "The patient
doesn't care about cost or similar factors that play
into clinical decision-making," he says. "The only thing
that matters is that he or she receives the best and
safest care possible."
Women's Health Magazine,
September/October 2005
|
|